Leo Dehon’s Patronage Today: Pastoral Accompaniment Creating Community in Times of Fragmentation

A Question That Cannot Be Avoided

There is something that many of us feel, but do not always dare to say out loud: we do not always know if what we are doing is pastoral or simply activism with religious content. I am thinking of the people who gathered in the Plaza de Mayo to pay tribute to Pope Francis, called together by Father Guillermo D.J., as well as the electronic music festival. Young people come to camps, recitals, pilgrimages, and then do they return? Or do they only return when there is an intense emotion? I wonder what we are building.

• Are we forming young people… or are we simply organizing activities?
• Do our spaces generate a true sense of belonging, or only moments?
• Do we know the history of the young people we accompany?
• Does our pastoral accompaniment build community… or does it reproduce the same fragmentation it seeks to heal?

These questions are not a judgment. They are an invitation. And it is precisely from here that this article was born: from the conviction that perhaps we do not need to reinvent everything, but to look again at experiences that already knew how to generate community, meaning, and transformation. One of them is the Saint Joseph Patronage, promoted by Leo Dehon, the founder of the Congregation of the Priests of the Sacred Heart.

Much More Than Simple Social Work

At first glance, the Saint Joseph Patronage might seem like just another activity: a space for young workers, with games, training, and religious moments. Something simple, almost minor.

But looking closer, we discover something much deeper: it was an experience of shared life. Young people did not merely participate. They were known, accompanied, and supported. Dehon did not work with “groups.” He worked with specific individuals, with their histories, their families, and their wounds; a part of the reparation was already visible at that moment.

He visited their homes. He listened to their realities. He wove bonds. And little by little, what had started as a meeting transformed into a community. This is what many of our pastoral proposals still do not achieve: not the activity, but the relationship maintained over time, belonging, and a sense of community beyond individuals or leaders.

A Process, Not an Event

If we read the Patronage from a pastoral perspective, we discover a key point: it was not an activity… it was a process. We can recognize three movements that are still completely relevant today:

1. Encounter (crowd): an open space, without conditions. The first contact. The welcome.
2. Community: the young person begins to stay, to feel part of it all, to create real bonds.
3. Discipleship and mission: the young person grows, takes on responsibilities, and begins to offer to others what he or she has received.

This is fundamental: everyone is not at the same stage at the same time, and pastoral care must respect these steps. We cannot demand commitment from someone who is still seeking to belong. We cannot send someone on a mission who has not yet experienced community.

This three-movement model is not a theoretical novelty. It is what Dehon lived, matured through intuition, and put into practice with young workers in the 19th century. And it remains a valid compass today.

The Challenge of Today: A Fragmented Culture

Today’s youth grow up in a world profoundly different from Dehon’s. A world where relationships are fragile, decisions immediate, commitments difficult, and where, often, meaning becomes blurred. The philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre describes this situation with an image that deserves reflection when he says that we live in a culture where moral words still exist, but have lost their depth. We speak of values, justice, love… but often without a common framework that gives them coherence.

MacIntyre calls this “emotivism”: a way of living where what matters is what each person feels at the moment, rather than what we build together as a community. The result is that disputes are not resolved, decisions become purely subjective, and each person is left alone with their experience.

This diagnosis is not pessimistic. It is a call to be precise. If we know the problem, we can offer real answers, not just more engaging activities. Let us think of the capacity of young people to organize themselves through viral challenges that put school security systems on alert, or the risks of access to weapons and certain extremist groups that promote challenges threatening the lives of others without measuring the legal consequences.

The Dehonian Proposal: Rebuilding from the Heart

Faced with this fragmentation, the Patronage offers a surprisingly current answer: rebuilding community from the bond. Not from abstract ideas, but from concrete experiences:

• Someone who listens and knows your story.
• A community that receives without conditions.
• A space where you belong instead of simply participating.
• A spirituality that gives meaning to what is lived.

The center of this proposal is not the activity, it is the relationship. The objective is not to gather, but to accompany life processes. There is an image that helps us understand this clearly today: the series The Chosen. Beyond its cinematic qualities, what the director manages to show is precisely the way Jesus relates to people: to each one in a particular way, based on their history, their wound, their deepest desire. No encounter is alike in the Gospel, and that is exactly what the Saint Joseph Patronage tried to reproduce: the pastoral care of concrete faces, and not of abstract groups. Are our communities and youth groups spaces where we recognize our adolescents and young people by their names and histories, or do we remain only at the anecdotal stage?

A Pastoral Accompaniment That Integrates

The Patronage reminds us that true youth ministry does not separate the social from the spiritual. It does not attack the “problem” of the young person, but addresses the young person as a whole. It integrates, sustains, humanizes, and repairs what is damaged.

A complete pastoral accompaniment includes:

• Knowing people by their name and history.
• Drawing closer to their families.
• Building a community, not just an audience.
• Connecting with other institutions and social actors.
• Offering a spiritual horizon that gives meaning to everything else.

Based on my experiences in youth ministry and associated processes with vulnerable populations (young migrants, women in contexts of exploitation, adolescents struggling with problematic consumption), I wondered how to bring pastoral care into dialogue with the human behavioral sciences.

This is how I arrived at a model that integrates the systems in which our young people evolve. This has a name in contemporary educational literature: the ecosystemic model. Bronfenbrenner systematized it in the 20th century, but Dehon lived it instinctively as early as the 19th century. The young person does not develop in a vacuum, but in a network of relationships: family, community, work, faith. A pastoral accompaniment that ignores all these levels only works halfway.

Return to the Outgoing

Dehon knew how to read his time. As a young lay student at the university, he went out to the poor of the Parisian neighborhoods. Later, as a priest, he approached young workers, their peripheries, their concrete realities. He did not wait for them to come to him.

I confess that this aspect of Dehon, as a layman and young university student, still seems like an unknown world, at least to me. Praying with his writings and letters during this period, I discovered this young student in Paris.

Today, the invitation is the same: go out. Meet young people where they are, not just in the spaces we control. Accompany them in their processes, not only when they coincide with our agendas. Build a community where solitude reigns today.

Youth ministry does not begin with an activity. It all begins with an encounter. And it grows when that encounter becomes community, because that is how the Master began: by provoking encounters and creating a community.

Perhaps the most honest question we can ask ourselves is not “how many young people participate?”, but rather “how many young people are known?” This difference, tiny in terms of words, changes everything in practice.

Some time ago, I wrote an article in which I argued that youth ministry should be an accompaniment that fosters encounter. Today, in this post-Francis era, I maintain the same conviction. It is the encounter that heals and restores this restorative trust: Jesus changes the lives of young people when we allow ourselves to be transformed by these encounters.

_______________ 

Bibliografía de referencia

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.

Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press.

van der Kolk, B. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Viking. Dehon, L. (1876). Association deSaint-Joseph. Archivos SCJ.